Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 07:14:59 AM
Website Home Help Calendar Login Register
News:

+  USAAC Air Attack Forums
|-+  USAAC - GENERAL
| |-+  Archives
| | |-+  Unfair Advantage Update
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Unfair Advantage Update  (Read 1030 times)
H@wk
USAAC Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 117



« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2009, 08:44:56 AM »

Attention......new post on uk forums...go have a look!!!

It just occurred to me,

I started this thread in the USAAC forum due to the fact one of our own Sysops was involved.

I did say one of our own didn't I.

Thus our USA Sysops felt compelled to confess on the UK site, oh well, what goes on here is our communities business, what effects all communities can go where they please.

Oh, back to, one of ours,

Why one of ours you ask?

The USAAC Community has a Administrator and a Head Sysops to represent us in the AA community, so what does that mean?

By the way, the other communities have a Administrator/Head Sysops that represent there community. It just so happens the USAAC is fortunate to have both.

Back to my original story, the Administrator and Head Sysops is voted in by the perspective communities, bet you all didn't know that, some do.

Now I was told, which can be verified, these elected positions is based on how our young community wishes who to elect for those positions.

I am not saying that there is anything wrong with whom we have representing us now, just making everyone aware that if changes need to be made it must be made by the community and that is you.

Something to think about everyone.

Salute
Logged

Temper
SysOps Mgr.

Offline Offline

Posts: 640



« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2009, 09:16:22 AM »

Quote
You know Temper, I'm beginning to question your judgment, you seem to think this is still a no biggie,

LoL "beginning to"? And here I thought you always questioned my judgment. You seem to be wrong about what I seem to think. This whole thing was a biggie. I spent more time looking for the facts of what happened on this than anything I have ever done with Air Attack.

Folks, I based my decision on the actions of Vipor as a whole, not on one mistake. He screwed up, he owned up to it, and I have the utmost confidence he will not screw up again.

In case I haven't been perfectly clear: Vipor will remain as a SysOp.

Logged


Lotta self-help tapes out there. Got one called "How to Handle Disappointment." I got it home and the box was empty.
H@wk
USAAC Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 117



« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2009, 10:59:26 AM »

Quote
You know Temper, I'm beginning to question your judgment, you seem to think this is still a no biggie,

LoL "beginning to"? And here I thought you always questioned my judgment. You seem to be wrong about what I seem to think. This whole thing was a biggie. I spent more time looking for the facts of what happened on this than anything I have ever done with Air Attack.

Folks, I based my decision on the actions of Vipor as a whole, not on one mistake. He screwed up, he owned up to it, and I have the utmost confidence he will not screw up again.

In case I haven't been perfectly clear: Vipor will remain as a SysOp.



Hmmm, no pictures, amazing.

I did say in my post that there is nothing wrong to who we have now, look above please.

Yes Sir, You made that perfectly clear, twas your decision to make Temper.

That so called mistake in which he was forced to own up to after 8 weeks cost GE the right to go into the finals against Warships, but that's ok, no biggie unless of course you talked to GE_Squadron.

Folks, I worked very hard soul searching right from wrong with no grey areas and came up with the conclusion that Tempers decision is morally wrong.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!